No buyer-facing portal
Gap vs Carma, Sweep
Carma gives every buyer an Impact Hub. Sweep gives every corporate a compliance dashboard. Our buyers get a PDF invoice — no portal to log in, track credits or generate reports.
Fix: Build a buyer portal — read-only access for clients to see credit status, retirement certificates, and impact metrics.
No discovery layer
Gap vs Carma, Xpansiv, CIX
Buyers can't find us unless we contact them directly. We're invisible to the SME and mid-market buyer segment that browses Carma and Xpansiv.
Fix: List on Carma marketplace (fast win) and Xpansiv CBL. Add a public project page with live credit availability and pricing.
MRV audit trail is manual
Gap vs Mangrove Systems · Compliance risk
Puro's June 2025 methodology requires a formal information system with timestamped records accessible to auditors. Our tracker has the data but no audit export.
Fix: Add Puro 2025 audit export — timestamped batch logs, lab reports, chain of custody.
No compliance-format export
Gap vs Sweep, Mangrove
Enterprise buyers need credit data in CSRD Article 8 and GRI 305-5 format for annual reports. Our certificates don't output in these formats, creating friction.
Fix: Add CSRD/GRI export to the tracker — one-click download of a retirement certificate formatted for compliance reporting.
No API or integrations
Gap vs Carma, Sweep
Carma has Shopify, Zapier and a public API. Sweep integrates with Snowflake and AWS. We have no external integrations — buyers can't pull credit data into their own systems.
Fix: Build a simple REST API exposing project data, credit availability and retirement records. Read-only first.
No third-party quality signal
Gap vs Sylvera-rated projects
Enterprise buyers check Sylvera ratings before purchase. Without one, we're asking buyers to trust self-reported data in a market shaken by low-quality offset scandals.
Fix: Apply for Sylvera rating on the Kalimantan project. High rating = marketing asset + premium pricing.